Schoenfeld Residuals of Multiple Imputation Data (Data Set 3)ĮFigure 8. Schoenfeld Residuals of Multiple Imputation Data (Data Set 2)ĮFigure 7. Schoenfeld Residuals of Multiple Imputation Data (Data Set 1)ĮFigure 6. Estimated Change in H Function by the Estimated Bivariate Response Conditional on Concurrent Substance ExposureĮFigure 5. Estimated Change in H Function Due to Univariate Substance Exposure DifferencesĮFigure 4. Unweighted vs Weighted Polysubstance Score by Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder DiagnosisĮFigure 3. Directed Acyclic Graph of Substance Exposures, Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Outcomes, and Measured CovariatesĮFigure 2. E Values of Main Substance Effects in Cox Proportional Hazards Model Reflecting Unmeasured Confounding and Exposure Misclassification BiasĮFigure 1. Unadjusted and Adjusted Cox Proportional Hazards Models Using Individual Substance and Polysubstance Categories With Inverse Probability Weighting for Preterm Birth to Correct for Potential Selection Bias in the Baseline Sample SelectionĮTable 8. Unadjusted and Adjusted Cox Proportional Hazards Models Using Individual Substance and Polysubstance Categories With Multiple Imputation Limited to Neurotypical Children as ComparatorĮTable 7. Cross-Validated Penalized Regression Models for Training Data Set of All Individual Substances and Their Interactions, Adjusted for Major CovariatesĮTable 6. Stratification of Single-Substance Cox Proportional Hazards Models and Substance-Adjusted Models by Sex of ChildĮTable 5. Unadjusted and Adjusted Cox Proportional Hazards Estimates of Polysubstance Scores With Additional Weighting SchemaĮTable 4. Pearson Correlation Matrix of Substance ExposuresĮTable 3. Comparison of Sociodemographic Characteristics Among Cohort Participants Who Completed Baseline Questionnaire vs Those With Electronic Medical Record Follow-upĮTable 2.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |